It seems that drinking water in Iraq, like the US, can give you diseases like cholera, unless you add chlorine to the water that is not TOO old.
But, in Iraq, some officials took bribes to use out of date chlorine in drinking water in South Iraq, and it gave lots of people cholera.
So, we see not only do minimal controls on corruption allow loss of money to taxpayers, but also loss of life. I read recently a copy of Business Week where the same problem affects US Military Jets, because vendors are selling the military sub-standard repair parts that may fail and CRASH the jet.
There should be no tolerance for corruption by the US, even in Iraq. Why build all the new water and sanitation systems if we allow the officials to get away with taking bribes and provide unsanitary drinking water?
The article at the link below provides more details, but it seems at least one of the officials, linked to one of the Iraqi militia groups, was "let go". Additionally, the article brings up the point that if someone is caught taking bribes or committing corruption, the Iraqi party they belong to help prevent their arrest. Thus, Iraq's political system has ethic challenges as well. Does the US really need to keep giving them funds and support when the government system is so unethical?
vj
Favorite quotes:
Political parties are expected to protect their members from arrest.
from the Independent in the UK
Corruption blamed as cholera rips through Iraq
By Patrick Cockburn in Baghdad
Friday, 10
October 2008

AFP/GETTY IMAGES
Children fill water containers in a former Baghdad army base, now a slum. Cholera has infected many supplies
A deadly outbreak of cholera in Iraq is being blamed on a scandal involving corrupt officials who failed to sterilise the local drinking water because they were bribed to buy chlorine from Iran that was long past its expiration date.
The centre of the epidemic is in Babil province, south of Baghdad, in the marshy lands east of the Euphrates river, not far from the ruins of ancient Babylon. In Baghdad, where half the six million population has no access to clean drinking water, people are now drinking only bottled or boiled water.
The Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, has appointed a commission of inquiry to find out why ineffective chlorine was being used. He is also refusing to release three officials under arrest despite demands from the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI) to which they are linked. In the town of al-Madhatiya, in southern Babil, a councillor involved in buying the chlorine was reportedly released after militiamen connected to ISCI intimidated police into freeing him.
The scandal over the contract is becoming a test case of the Maliki government's willingness to tackle the pervasive corruption in Iraq where officials see their jobs primarily as a way of enriching themselves through bribes. It is also a test of his ability to exercise central control over ISCI and parties which have been hitherto dominant outside Baghdad.
Cholera is endemic in Iraq but last year there was an epidemic in northern Iraq which was far more serious than anything seen for years. Some 4,700 people, mostly in Sulaimaniyah province, were struck.
This year, the government hoped to stop another outbreak of the disease by repairing shattered water and sanitation stations and putting chlorine in the water supply. An Iraqi government official, who did not want his name published, said the Health Ministry bought $11m (£6.4m) worth of chlorine from Iran for use in the provinces of Babil, Diwaniyah and Kerbala, all on the Euphrates river south of Baghdad.
In the latter two provinces, officials noticed that the chlorine was old and the time during which it could be employed effectively had expired, and refused to use it. But in Babil the chlorine was put in the fresh water supply stations at al-Madhatiyah, al-Hashimiyah and al-Qasim, south-east of the provincial capital, al-Hillah. Soon 222 people were confirmed as having cholera in Babil, in a total of 420 cases of whom seven have died.
The scandal is a reflection of the the way Iraqi politics works. The ruling parties monopolise jobs and contracts. It is impossible to find work at any level in most ministries without a letter of commendation from one of the parties in the government. The enormous Iraqi government apparatus, employing some two million people, is a patronage machine. There are now more state officials than under Saddam, but it is unable to supply electricity, food rations and clean water, despite Iraq's $80bn in accumulated oil revenues.
The power base of ISCI, the most powerful Shia religious party, is the Shia provinces of southern Iraq between Baghdad and Basra. Political parties are expected to protect their members from arrest. This explains what happened next. The officials arrested in Babil belonged to the Badr Organisation, the militia wing of ISCI. Leaders of the party demanded their release but Mr Maliki refused. Badr militants then turned up at a police station in al-Madhatiya and forced the police to release a councillor apparently involved in purchasing the chlorine.
But the grand Shia coalition which won more than half the seats in the Iraqi parliament in the last election in December 2005 has broken up. Mr Maliki is trying to build up his own Dawa party, using the resources of the state.
He has deepening differences with ISCI which won most of the southern Iraqi provinces. They accuse him of trying to create a power base in what was previously their territory by paying the tribes who belong to government-sponsored "support councils" in southern Iraq. His aim is to get his own candidates elected in the provincial and parliamentary elections next year. "These will be crucial in deciding who will hold power in Iraq in future," said one senior Iraqi official.
Control of oil revenues gives Mr Maliki a crucial card. Iraq has 50 to 60 per cent unemployment and most jobs are with the state. Salaries of state employees have risen sharply. But the government remains largely dysfunctional aside from its growing military strength. Iraqi journalists are encouraged and paid to write "good news" stories. In Baghdad, people notice there is little mention of the cholera in the media. This provokes fear that the epidemic may be worse than the government admits.
After the invasion: Services in Iraq
* Before the war, Baghdad had electricity between 16 and 24 hours a day. This has dropped to just under 12.
* There was no national mobile phone network, now there are at least 12 million subscribers.
* In April 2007 there were 261,000 internet subscribers. Before the war this number was estimated as 4,500.
* Of the 34,000 doctors registered in pre-war Iraq, 20,000 fled, 2,000 have been killed and 250 kidnapped.
* Registered cars more than doubled, to 3.1 million by October 2005.
"A deadly outbreak of cholera in Iraq is being blamed on a scandal involving corrupt officials who failed to sterilise the local drinking water because they were bribed to buy chlorine from Iran that was long past its expiration date."
It's upsetting that we're still having problems like this with clean drinking water, despite that we've had chlorine in the mainstream for over 100 years ago. I've done some work for the American Chemistry Council and I know how readily available chlorine is, so the fact that there are still outbreaks like this is heartbreaking.
Posted by: Faustas Glenn | October 14, 2008 at 01:11 PM
"It seems that drinking water in Iraq, like the US, can give you diseases like cholera, unless you add chlorine to the water that is not TOO old."
Yes, you have to make sure that the chlorine hasn't expired, and in this case that's what looks like happened. Either way though, they should definitely continue to distribute chlorine to Iraq's drinking water, the last thing we need are huge outbreaks of water born diseases. I've done some work for the American Chemistry Council, and in celebrating the 100th year of having chlorine I hope we don't begin backpedaling in the coming years, especially in third world countries.
Posted by: Danielle Richmond | October 24, 2008 at 02:16 PM